We cannot allow demand for air travel spiral out if control for purely economic reasons to the deteriment of our FRAGILE environment.
801
J.W.
I am strongly opposed to airport expansion on environmental grounds.
800
Stephen Dalton
It is plain for all to see that the energy (CO2) required to lift 500 tonnes of aircraft over 30,000ft and transport all this mass several thousand miles and several thousand times a day is mindboggling high.
799
Lee Dalton
Its time to get off this crazy train.
798
James Reeves
I am opposed to airport expansion to protect air quality, reduce noise pollution, stop the land being developed on and to reduce the potential effects on the environment.
797
Jon Hooper
Air travel is the only form of public transport the Government are encouraging, yet it is also the most environmentally unsustainable and generally unnecessary. I call for a Government policy to reduce air traffic.
796
Caroline Frances-King
As an environmentalist I oppose the expansion of any unsustainable forms of transport and will actively campaign for a cleaner, healthier and better environment for all.
795
paul
airport expansion would not be needed if the true cost of air travel was reflected in the price of tickets. The first step to show the true cost MUST be to tax aviation fuel, thereby making the aircraft operators and users pay for the damage they cause and reduce the amount of aircraft use, removing the need for expansion. Any aviation tax must also be high to recoup the money lost through it's not being taxed for so long. Revenue from the tax must be used to alleviate the environmental problems caused by the aviation industry (both military and civil).
794
George Monbiot
Tackling climate change is impossible while air transport continues to grow.
793
David Beasley
Air travel is the fastest growing source of greenhouse gas emissions. The government should be taking action to *discourage* air travel, not enable its expansion all the more.